Outcomes of a Supplemental Learning Program for Children in Care at Family and Children's Services of Renfrew County
By Dr. Michael O'Brien and John Rutland
Increasingly the child welfare system in Ontario is
working actively to remediate the educational
deficits of children in its care. As a variety of
approaches are being used, it is important to
evaluate the effectiveness of the programs being
implemented. Family and Children’s Services of
Renfrew County has been offering a supplemental
learning program for children in care since 2000.
We chose the KUMON math and reading
supplemental program which is the largest of its
kind in the world. The article will examine the
outcomes achieved since we embarked on a
partnership with KUMON Canada.
The KUMON method was chosen based both on the
quality of the program and a belief that children in
care would be able to achieve success with it. Our
goal for each child enrolled in the program is to
achieve grade level success. At the time of
enrollment students complete a diagnostic test with
their instructor. Using the results of these tests, an
individualized program is established for each child.
Students begin at a point at which they can
complete the material comfortably. From there,
students advance through the materials using a
mastery learning approach. This means that
students advance only when they have
demonstrated mastery of the material. Daily practice
is a key to success with this method. Typically the
expectation is that a child will be enrolled in the
program for at least one year. The method is
structured to foster continuous improvement via the
accurate and timely completion of worksheets. The
children attend one of our learning centres twice a
week to complete worksheets under the supervision
of an instructor and assistants. The commitment of
foster parents and social workers is essential as
daily assignments that require about 20 minutes a
day must be completed in the foster home. Typically
we focus on children between the ages of four and 13, however, any high school student who wishes to
attend is welcome. At any given time 50 to 60
children in care are enrolled in the program. Family
and Children’s Services holds the franchise for
Renfrew County. As KUMON is a supplemental
education program that can be used for both
remediation and enrichment, it can be of benefit to
any child. In addition to offsetting the cost of the
operation of our program, the involvement of fee
paying students also serves to normalize the tutorial
experience. We have 90 fee paying participants in
the program. Upon entering one of our learning
centres one sees no difference between the children
in care and the fee paying students. It is remarkable
to note how smoothly the learning centres operate
when one considers the behavioural difficulties
being experienced by so many of our children in
care.
The fundamental question to be answered through
the evaluative research has been to determine
whether a significant improvement in academic
skills could be attributed to the math and reading
supplemental program. In addition to the goal of
evaluating improvement in both academic
achievement and skills, the evaluation design has
also included the goals of evaluating the suitability
of the program for children in care, satisfaction with
the program from the perspective of children, foster
parents and social workers, as well as any
unintended changes in the emotional and
behavioural functioning of participants. Quantitative
outcomes have been evaluated by examining
changes in Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)
scores and math and reading grades at school.
Qualitative outcomes have been addressed through
surveys of children in care, foster parents and
teachers, and through focus groups with the
workers for the children. The outputs that have been
considered are retention and progress in completing the levels within the KUMON program in comparison
to fee paying participants both in Renfrew County
and KUMON sites in Canada.
Ensuring a high level of retention in this
supplemental learning program is critical to its
success. The agency was aware it would face
challenges around retention due to the emotional
and behavioural difficulties faced by many children
in care, distances in traveling to the program sites in
the large geographic area of Renfrew county, and
the likelihood that many children would be less than
enthused about having more educational demands
placed upon them. The average time spent enrolled
in KUMON for children in care is usually about 20
months which is very comparable to the data
collected by KUMON. The design of the program
which includes self-directed learning, immediate
success for any children who complete the assigned
work, and regular awards and periodic special
events all increase motivation and ultimately
retention. Volunteer drivers are used in instances
when foster parents are unable to bring their foster
child to a KUMON site twice a week. Presentations
have been made to foster parents and children’s
services workers about strategies they might use to
support children in care who are participating. At
each site an instructor is available to provide one-to-one
support to foster parents who are having issues
with their foster child’s engagement with the
program. The other output that has been measured
since the program was launched has been the
number of levels completed by children in care.
KUMON is comprised of a number of levels of
increasing difficulty beginning at the pre-school
stage of math and reading and progressing to the
level of math and reading required for secondary
school graduation. We have found that children in
care are completing a satisfactory number of levels,
but at a moderately lesser number of levels than our
fee paying participants.
School report card results and the WRAT have been
used to measure the progress of children enrolled in
KUMON over periods of time. The following school report card results depict reading marks for children
enrolled in KUMON reading, and math marks for
children enrolled in KUMON math. The times series
data was extracted from the children’s files
corresponding to the time period in which they were
enrolled in our program, and each of the times
represent consecutive report card results for the
children.
Table 1
School Report Card Results - Readinga |
|
N |
Mean |
Reading Time 1 |
24 |
5.50 |
Reading Time 2 |
24 |
5.96 |
Reading Time 3 |
24 |
6.54 |
Reading Time 4 |
24 |
7.13 |
a. Coding Scheme for School Report Cards:
A+=12, A=11, A-=10, B+=9, B=8, B-=7,
C+=6, C=5, C-=4, D+=3, D=2, D-=1, F=0 |
Table 2
School Report Card Results - Matha |
|
N |
Mean |
Math Time 1 |
26 |
7.08 |
Math Time 2 |
26 |
7.00 |
Math Time 3 |
26 |
7.08 |
a. Coding Scheme for School Report Cards:
A+=12, A=11, A-=10, B+=9, B=8, B-=7,
C+=6, C=5, C-=4, D+=3, D=2, D-=1, F=0 |
A paired samples t-test taken at time 1 and time 4
for the reading grades found the progress to be
statistically significant at the 99 percent level
(N=24). A paired samples t-test performed on a
larger sample of 48 children at time 1 and time 3
was not quite statistically significant, but did show
improvement in reading grades. The math grades
were not found to be statistically significant (N=26).
Administration of WRAT occurs each May and June.
Depending on the date of entry of a child into the
supplementary learning program the initial measure
may or may not be a true baseline measure. Given
that some of the children are not tested until they
have been in the program for a period of time it is
our view that it is likely their baseline scores would
have been lower had they been tested immediately
upon entry into KUMON. A standard score of 100 is
the average within the general population of
children. Our goal has been to elevate the WRAT
scores of children in care up to and beyond the
standard score. Tables 3 and 4 illustrate the time
series results that have been obtained with the
WRAT instrument.
Table 3
Time Series WRAT Scores for Reading |
|
N |
Mean |
Reading time 1 |
20 |
90.85 |
Reading time 3 |
20 |
97.70 |
Table 4
Time Series WRAT Scores for Math |
|
N |
Mean |
Math time 1 |
24 |
85.96 |
Math time 2 |
24 |
90.54 |
A paired samples t-test performed at time 1 and
time 3 found that change in reading scores to be
statistically significant at the 95 percent level
(N=20). A paired samples t-test performed at time 1
and time 2 found the change in math scores to be
close to, but not statistically significant (N=24).
There may be some discrepancy between the
improvement in math WRAT scores versus the lack
of improvement in math grades at school, but as the
two samples do not each contain all the same
children no discrepancy may exist at all.
Qualitative information about outcomes has been
gathered from a number of sources. In June 2001,
after the program had been running for a year, we
surveyed teachers about their perceptions of
children in care enrolled in the KUMON. The
teachers stated that the children had usually
improved in math if they were enrolled in our math
modules and reading if they were enrolled in our
reading modules. Persistence, work completion, and
task focus were observed to have improved.
Noticeable improvements in confidence were not
reported by the teachers. In 2007, as part of a larger
survey of foster parents, a set of questions about
our supplementary educational program were asked.
Of those who had experience with enrolling a foster
child in KUMON a large percentage reported that the
program had been beneficial and had improved their
foster child’s school grades. More than half of that
group saw an improvement in the self esteem of
their foster children, while few noticed any
improvement in behaviour that they felt could be
attributed to success in KUMON. The foster parents’
perceptions about behaviour were confirmed by
examining the Child and Adolescent Functional
Assessment Scale (CAFAS) results for children in our
care which showed no statistically significant
improvements over time in total CAFAS scores
related to the time period in which the children
participated in our program. Children’s services
workers have consistently praised the effectiveness
of KUMON. In addition, discussions with the workers
have also been helpful in understanding some of the
barriers to attracting and retaining foster children in
the program, such as transportation and the extra
demands placed on foster parents who often
supervise children in completing their KUMON
assignments. Perhaps, some of the most important
information comes from the children themselves.
One youngster related with pride how she was the
second last person standing in her class in an oral
math contest. Without her involvement in our
program this moment would likely never have
occurred. Another child was proud of moving from
being the weakest in her class in math to becoming
the teacher’s math assistant. One of the children would break down in tears any time there was a new
concept introduced in KUMON. This problem
persisted for a year but she now faces new concepts
without hesitation. These are examples of children
and youth who grew not only scholastically but also
with respect to their self-confidence.
In conclusion, it has been our experience that the
commitment of foster parents and parents in the
case of the fee paying participants, is absolutely
critical to success with KUMON. Since commitment
is so important, we would like to end by sharing a
situation that happened in one our centres which
exemplifies commitment, albeit beyond what you
would ever expect. A grandmother, who is a kinship
care provider to her grandson, brought her
grandson to the centre on the day her husband of
40 years passed away. She is not a very well-educated
woman but has rarely missed coming to
the centre. We have had the sense that she sees our
program as a way out of the obstacles she and her
children have faced in their lives. Although it was
clearly an incredibly difficult day for her she did not
want her grandson to miss a day at our program. We
hope that we can all be as passionate and
committed to the education of foster children as
that grandmother is to her grandson’s future. We
have had our share of successes and failures in
offering a supplementary educational program. Our
biggest challenges are to continue to increase the
numbers of foster children participating in the program and to ensure their retention once they
have enrolled. From many sources we see evidence
we are on the right course and will continue with the
investment we have made in realizing better
educational outcomes for children in our care. We,
will continue to use the WRAT instrument and
changes in school grades to measure success.
Although we have gathered some evidence about
KUMON’s efficacy as a supplementary learning
program for children in care it is our intention to
develop an increasingly large sample of time series
data to buttress the findings presented in this
paper.
About Authors
Dr. Michael O’Brien is the Director of Research and
Quality Assurance at the Family and Children’s
Services of Renfrew County. He is an Assistant
Professor at the School of Social Work, Dalhousie
University in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
John Rutland, M.ED., is a retired special education
consultant and is the Education Coordinator at
Family and Children’s Services of Renfrew County in
Ontario.
Previous article: The Role of Child and Youth Care Practitioners in Evidence - Based Practice in Group Care: Executive Summary
Next article: Why Do the Youth on My Caseload Harm Themselves? Communications As a Possible Factor in Youth Deliberate Self-Harm |